Far Cry 4

Far Cry 4, even after its release, was considered an unsuccessful part compared to the 3rd part! I really liked Vaas in the 3rd part! However, when the game came out, I beat it, after which I told myself that the 3rd part was cooler and decided to remember the past - go through the 3rd part again! And then I realized that the 4th part is not so bad!

PROS:

What I liked about the game! And I liked a lot about the game - from the plot to the graphics! For the first time, in my opinion, skirts showed at exhibitions the quality of the picture that they want to sell to the end user! And to be honest, I liked the picture more than in Far Cry 3 (No wonder the 3rd part was released in 2013 and for those years the picture of the headlights of Far Cry 3 is really not bad, although they promised somethi… Read full

I started playing with the wonderful 3rd part and will compare the new part with it.

The developers had a good idea to replace the scenery of the island with mountain valleys. The game has become more multi-level and, accordingly, more interesting. We also improved interaction with animals + added a helicopter.

As a result, the gameplay part has become better, but the atmosphere of the civil war and the plot component leave much to be desired. I lack empathy for the main characters, and I also lack the charisma of the villain.

As a result, I will give the game: 8.6 / 10

Very cool game. Interesting, exciting and beautiful.

Beautiful landscapes. It was nice to walk around the vast expanses of Far Cry 4. I also love climbing into hidden places, looking for easter eggs and missions.

The NPCs needed to be better developed. Although this is not the main problem. But more about her a little later.

Animals are also too aggressive. They are not that aggressive in reality. But in the game you only have to approach the animals, and they will immediately attack you. It’s also worth noting those very annoying hawks.

And here is the main disadvantage. This is Pagan Min!!! In my opinion he was a bad boss of the game. Firstly, he was not shown much, and secondly, in my opinion, he is from the blue squad. Vaas was a hundred times better than him! The game would be just a bomb… Read full

Scold Ubisoft and talk about all the sins and sins of this original, interesting, slightly irresponsible but wonderful studio. From under their light... little hands came many masterpieces. And for some reason, while criticizing Assassins Creed.Unity and Watch Dogs, as well as Far Cry 2, we forget about the first, second and fourth Assassins, 3 Far Cry and many other good games that these comrades made.

Now about Far Cry. Part 3 is rightfully considered the best. Excellent graphics, excellent plot, interesting and thoughtful characters, convenient gameplay and most importantly - a large open world - a tropical island. Truly a paradise, at first glance, hiding many cruel secrets. The game was truly amazing.

When part 4 was announced, I knew that the game would be at least good. And she met … Read full

Far cry 4 is what I call ctrl c + ctrl v of the third part. The tropics have just been replaced by mountains. And the main villain was replaced externally, but they also tried to add a touch of madness to him from a different angle (Montenegro was not even close to Vaas). The dialogues and characters in the game were not engaging in any way (only Roji and Yeji were more or less cool), I wanted to skip the rest of the cutscenes, but alas there was no such button.

Plot? Yes, it’s more likely that, for the sake of argument, the main character should travel from one end of the map to the other. And what really infuriated me was the local, monotonous simulation of life. You are going so calmly on your assignment. And then oops, and every 100 meters there are bandits with machine guns, who are c… Read full

For me, the best part in the series.

The plot of the game is excellent, but in places it is crumpled due to which some characters such as Paul de Pleur were stupidly not allowed to open up. Pagan Min is cool and, in my opinion, much more interesting than the hysterical Vaas. The only problem with Pagan is that he has too little screen time. He should have been given a lot more timing. The gameplay also did not disappoint, plus, unlike FC3, there was variability due to which some missions are completed differently depending on the player’s choice.

The only thing that let us down was the inconvenient controls in places (I curse the person who bound the wing suit to Shift) and the main character Ajay Gayle, who either reacts very sluggishly to what is happening around him or does not react at all.

My total: 8.8

One of the unicorns, that I really like and am replaying in 2024, right after having gone through Bioshock Infinite again. I find it better than 3rd one in terms of mechanics and the overall atmosphere. I'm not really a gamer and find most of the other games boring and too much of "you must go there" type.

This is the best thing YouTube has done since Far Cry 3 in terms of optimization. When I bought the game, I thought that I would again have to sit for hours in the graphics settings to achieve a smooth picture, but in reality everything turned out to be quite excellent. Nothing slows down, there are no bugs, almost none (I went into textures a couple of times). I went through the third part 3 times, and each time I left the plot for later. In this part I did the same: I walk around, capture outposts, kill living creatures, and just wander around the map. Yes, the graphics and gameplay remained from part 3, but the map is different. Although I like the game, I can’t call it a full-fledged game, it’s more of an addon, like Blood Dragonwas, only bigger.

Far Cry 4, a game from the well-known company ubisoft, has released a continuation of the Far Cry game series. This game gives us the opportunity to visit the fictional place of Kirat. The main character of the game is Ajay Gayle. We have to fight for the golden path against the army of King Pagan Min. We have a large selection of equipment, equipment (from ATVs to elephants) and weapons. The game was remembered for its plot choices, various secondary missions, hunting

Far cry 4 will not please you with as many interesting personalities as it was in far cry 3, but at the same time the world has become much richer than in the third part. I can talk for a long time about the world and its components, but I will speak briefly. The world does not seem like a reskin; there are many innovations such as mountaineering and elephant riding. What about the villain, he's good, but not as good as Vaas. The story is not boring, and not so pretentious (don’t forget what it is). The money system feels strange due to the amount of cash itself, although this is the money of a self-proclaimed republic. The multiplayer game mode was very pleasing, it was very fun to play with a friend. Red wolves are very annoying, after this game I began to hate dogs in video games, more than before. Overall I liked the game, it's a good game.

When someone says the word "Far Cry", you immediately think of Vaas, don't you? It’s not like that for me, really! No matter how much players dislike the fourth part, it is impossible not to love Pagan Min. I think I played the entire game just to take a couple of photos with the ruler of the great Kyrat! But overall the game is very good. From shooting physics to graphics!

I really liked it! I played day, night, morning - whenever I had a free minute!

even just went off the trail and went around killing animals, selling skins, making upgrades. Don't be bored!

The plot - I didn’t understand a lot of things, but what I did understand - I flew in to throw my mother’s ashes into another world, BUT! your car was stopped and almost everyone was killed, you survived because an old friend* of your father recognized you (this friend* is the main villain here). He knew both you and your mother, he invites you to his hut, he goes somewhere*, I sit waiting... waiting... so he came, took me to the shrine and I put my mother’s ashes in the shrine... THE END

BUT! approximately 90% choose the more difficult path - I sit and wait... but for some reason I run away from the hous… Read full

As for me, the graphics are almost no different from the previous part, to be honest, I expected more. The disadvantages of the game are a short storyline, lack of additional missions (from minor characters), and a small map. Probably, all of the above was not enough for me because I completed 90% of the game in a couple of days, despite the fact that I completed the story part in about 6-7 hours.

So, to summarize, I can rate the game 7 out of 10 points. While I rated the previous part at 9 out of 10. Let's hope that in the next part of the game they will take into account all the mistakes they made when creating this part.

Good game. The gameplay is almost the same as in the third part with minor changes that essentially do not give anything new or interesting, but the game still captivates you for a while. The plot is as primitive as a stick, and in general the weakest side of the game. In technical terms, the graphics are not very good, but they are not bad either; the result is a picture that is quite pleasing to the eye. The open world is the biggest plus of the game, and sometimes looking at some of the landscapes is truly wonderful. Overall rating: 7 out of 10.

Already familiar, slightly boring and easily recognizable gameplay with a clearly noticeable flavor of India.

This time, peace and order will be brought by force to the mountain kingdom of Kirat. A small but rich kingdom in drugs, gold and mercenaries with yet another mentally ill leader.

It is with the acquaintance with this extraordinary personality that our misadventures begin and, interspersed with quests of average interest and more interesting shootouts, they continue with a series of not the warmest meetings.

In general, the game appeals to a strong average player, although the impression creeps in that it was difficult to come up with ideas, and the schedule dictated that decisions be made quickly.