Google Deleted a Purchased Lord of the Rings Trilogy From a Library Years Later
A man opened his Google library to watch the extended editions of "The Lord of the Rings" and couldn't find them. He'd bought Peter Jackson's trilogy back in 2022, paid for it honestly, and four years later the films simply vanished from his account — no warning, no email, no explanation. He posted his support chat log on Reddit, and the screenshots spread across the internet within a couple of days. The support agent's response was about as brief as it gets: those films are no longer available in the catalog. His request for a refund was denied — the purchase fell outside Google's standard 120-day window, during which it's willing to refund the cost or issue a gift card. Asked whether he could at least get a gift card, he got the same refusal.
From there, the conversation took an almost comical turn. The support agent suggested he reach out to YouTube support instead, since the film is hosted on their platform and is still available there. The user reasonably pointed out that he'd bought it through Google Movies & TV, only to be told that the films had been removed from that service's catalog and no longer existed in the system. In short, he got bounced around inside the same company.
I bought them in 2022, and suddenly they're unavailable, with no way to get a refund or a gift card. That just doesn't feel right.
There's an important caveat here, without which the story sounds scarier than it actually is. This doesn't appear to be a mass purge: other users report that the extended editions are still sitting in their libraries, and the trilogy can still be purchased in a number of countries. This looks more like a regional licensing issue or a glitch tied to one specific account, rather than Google wiping Middle-earth for everyone at once. The company hasn't given any official comment, and the Reddit thread itself had already been deleted by the time the story spread.
The underlying problem, though, is systemic, and it's long since outgrown forum outrage. The "buy" button in digital storefronts legally means not a purchase, but a revocable license: if the seller loses the rights to the content, access disappears even for people who already paid for it. Since the start of 2025, California has had a law directly banning the use of "buy" and "purchase" unless the buyer is separately and clearly told that they're getting a license, and that it can be revoked. Amazon is being sued over the exact same issue, with plaintiffs arguing that its storefront wording misleads people. And the broader dispute over what a person actually gets when they click "buy" has already reached the courts in the games industry too.
Reddit's reaction boiled down to two lines, repeated over and over in different forms: "this is exactly why physical media matters" and "you will own nothing and you will be happy" — the second one, notably, written by someone who has Blu-rays sitting at home. The argument is simple and hard to counter: a disc on a shelf can't be pulled from a catalog, and it can't be revoked once a licensing agreement between two companies — one the buyer will never even know about — expires. The extended editions of The Lord of the Rings run over eleven hours combined — and, as it turns out, those eleven hours exist only for as long as someone in a legal department doesn't decide otherwise.
Is your digital library huge — or do you prefer keeping your favorites on a disc, on your own drive? Tell us in the comments.
-
Sean Astin says he earned about $250,000 for The Lord of the Rings trilogy and sold his house -
SteamDB leak points to a Legacy Edition of The Lord of the Rings: War in the North -
Google Tests Search Homepage Redesign That Swaps the Search Button for AI Features -
The Lord of the Rings Online Expansion The Wolves of Mordor Unveiled -
Empire Shares First Look at Gandalf in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 3
