Games Warface All reviews Review from Стас Карпов

I played the game from 2013 to 2017 (actively, I also played in 2018-2020). One of the worst shooters. The animations are darkness, the damage doesn’t go through (synchronization is generally stupid g.... stupid g...), there are readers, the imbalance is solved by donation and denying is stupid.

Okay, if we were talking about WF 2012-2017 (especially 2016), when you could play without donating. Now it’s just darkness, an eternal arms race, they’re actively making money from hamsters. Shooting - no comment. Shit, CS is much better. Graphics - well, the bottom (the fluff from the first person looks normal, but many of them from 3 are low-poly). If you think it's good, then you guys haven't played games from 2008 onwards. Yes, even for F2P the graph is mediocre. The community is toxic, just cruel. Well, the developers are also scammers. Doesn't deserve more than 1.5 points. If we evaluate Warface from 2012-2017, then it would deserve 6.5-7 points. The game had a chance to become a real top, but with a publisher like Mail.Ru you can’t float away.

And, as they say, if you don’t play, then the game is good

5.5
Comments 1
Leave a comment
Блин, лажа. Хотел 1,5 балла поставить, но забыл счётчик передвинуть 😂😂
Reply