Diablo 2: Resurrected

The gameplay is quite monotonous. Battle, portal to the city, sorting things out. Repeat the cycle until completely satisfied. Such games are already called the common noun “diabloid”. (Although it could be a shooter. "Looter shooter.") Sometimes the choice of wearable items makes you think, and their storage space is limited by inventory and chest (in a regular unmodified game). Like the choice of skills, there is also a fork in the road. Because you can't use everyone. This is inconvenient, and it is better to have one strong thing than many weak ones. One thing is clear in such games - do not rush to spend skill points unless absolutely necessary, while the game is already comfortable. It may be beneficial to develop something else in the future. You need to have enough points for the m… Read full

Those who give 1 out of 10 apparently want future remasters to be like Warcraft 3 Refunded, and not Diablo 2 Rezzurekted. Despite certain problems at the start, this is a rare remake where the authors really tried (and right now I’m no longer talking about the rotten Blizzard, but about that outsourcing company that redrew the graphics for them). In fact, d2 now looks even better than d3, and her style was already better than thirds. If you don’t like something, there are a lot of ratings between 1 and 10. Few people equate this good remake with the really rotten remakes that Blix have released lately, which is extremely stupid and not objective.