Diablo 2: Resurrected

The game is simply gorgeous, there are no questions about the updated graphics, if you buy for a single-player game without an Internet connection, then you can give a review of 9 out of 10, but in a single-player game you lose 90% of all content.

Why is my rating 1 out of 10? For optimization.

Let's start with the fact that the game is only 3 weeks old, of which probably 2 weeks it simply does not work, the servers are down 2/3 of the day. They raise the servers and after an hour they fall again, for at least the last 5 days during the daytime the servers have been consistently disconnected.

A game with online mechanics from 20 years ago, literally. The game can have up to 8 players, 20 years ago the first Pentiums with 64 megabytes of RAM and an Internet speed of 3 kB could easily cope with… Read full

Battlenet is the bottom, comrades. They collected money for reworking Diablo graphics, but in reality it was a complete failure of the online game. There are a limited number of places on the servers, there are constant lags. Because of this, it is impossible to use the same cube, it simply does not work. I wanted to play online on Monday evening, wait in line, there are 128 people in front of me! WTF?! If I had known about these moments, I would never have bought this garbage!

As you know, since the game was released there have been problems with the servers. It would seem that, well, it happens - they will fix it. But the problem is that the neighbors don’t fix anything. One gets the impression that the developers simply gave up on the servers, and instead of solutions, they rub points by, for example, introducing queues to the server. But standing in line and logging onto the server is far from a guarantee that you will enjoy the game. You will most likely be immediately kicked out of the server and back into the queue. In addition, there is constant disconnection from the servers. As soon as you reach which Mephisto thread, voila, the message “connection break” appears. In no other network game do I have such problems with servers as in Diablo. The saddest th… Read full

The gameplay is quite monotonous. Battle, portal to the city, sorting things out. Repeat the cycle until completely satisfied. Such games are already called the common noun “diabloid”. (Although it could be a shooter. "Looter shooter.") Sometimes the choice of wearable items makes you think, and their storage space is limited by inventory and chest (in a regular unmodified game). Like the choice of skills, there is also a fork in the road. Because you can't use everyone. This is inconvenient, and it is better to have one strong thing than many weak ones. One thing is clear in such games - do not rush to spend skill points unless absolutely necessary, while the game is already comfortable. It may be beneficial to develop something else in the future. You need to have enough points for the m… Read full

Those who give 1 out of 10 apparently want future remasters to be like Warcraft 3 Refunded, and not Diablo 2 Rezzurekted. Despite certain problems at the start, this is a rare remake where the authors really tried (and right now I’m no longer talking about the rotten Blizzard, but about that outsourcing company that redrew the graphics for them). In fact, d2 now looks even better than d3, and her style was already better than thirds. If you don’t like something, there are a lot of ratings between 1 and 10. Few people equate this good remake with the really rotten remakes that Blix have released lately, which is extremely stupid and not objective.