Starfield

Good game, the space part was clearly made with Elite Dangerous and Star Citizen in mind. But the simplified version is still not space. Nevertheless, in my opinion, as a fan of the elite, they did it well.

As for the ground-based one, we definitely looked at No Mans Sky, it feels good. In general, I like the exploration, the only thing is that there are a lot of different stations and structures crammed close together on different stones, it looks illogical and strange.

The colonies are well done, I was stuck on Mars for quite a long time with quests, and even building a base.

The only thing that is not very pleasing is the strong legacy of Fallout. I still didn’t like the builds there; they could have come up with something more interesting for different playstyles. Well, equipment upgrades… Read full

As for me, the game is worse than Fallout 4 and Skyrim

Yes, the game is certainly beautiful, and the planets are beautiful, but they are empty and monotonous. Even before the release, it was clear that a huge and empty world was just an idea. The plot is not interesting at all and is not engaging, even in Skyrim it was at least somewhat intriguing.

Result: a pacifier in a beautiful wrapper

Not a bad game, similar to all gazebo games only in space. There is a minus: there is no Russian language and there are a lot of downloads, there are still bugs, although not often, but the game is not bad

It's boring to travel around planets in the game. The gameplay is not engaging. So are the characters. I recommend it for those who do not value their time.

The game itself is boring Plains.. Plains.. Plains... The developers did not want to make 3 cities and 3 planets, but made 3 cities and 1000 hectares of empty land. Add to that terrible optimization and voila! Starfield!

I liked the game, despite the few bugs and friezes that had to be removed using the BES program. Everyone who played it and criticized it, you were in vain. You all did the same with the fallout, mass effect series, and still continued to play like that so you will criticize Starfield and then when everything settles down you will play it the same way...after all, the game is worthy of its player

The game is wonderful and interesting. It takes its rightful place among other favorite games. What are the games from this developer famous for? They are famous for their freedom. These are the first lines that have been written about since Morrowind. In this game, you can complete the starting set of tasks, which is mainly aimed at teaching the game, TO GET ON THE PLOT COMPLETELY, and after playing for a couple of months, remember the plot. In this particular game, you can fly through missions and complete it in a week. But this is a game, this is a world in which you can “live.” Imagine that you are there. Why do you, every day in your life, ask everyone around you to give you tasks? Most likely not. You most likely send everyone through the forest on their errands, so send them here to… Read full

The idea of ​​the game is good, even excellent. The development and saturation of the world is terrible. Graphics from the 2000s, why such a waste of money on the GPU and RAM. If you load about 1000 modifications into the world of Starfield (like in Skyrim), then the toy will be what you need. IMHO Horizon is 100500 times better.

In general, if I describe Starfield in detail, I’ll subscribe to every word of the flaming grandfather Mad, the only thing I don’t agree with is the complexity, IMHO, it needs to be half as high, i.e. hard is too much, normal is too much, everything else is fine. Briefly from myself on the matter: Everyone knows what *the worlds from the gazebo look like, this is it, the only thing, probably the most technologically advanced that they sculpted. If you are looking for a strong, beautiful plot, pass by, don’t waste your time. If you are looking for a big world with who knows what, where something lives on its own and you just wandered in by accident, this is your game. There is a rumor that the engine is still the same, if so, my respects, I sincerely did not believe that it was possible to … Read full

So-so 2.5/5 the beginning is drawn out the plot was not impressed the space itself is empty some downloads optimization lags on my 4080 monitor 2560x1440 and there are terrible lags from time to time if installed on the hard drive a fatal error in fact you won’t have to extract resources as you play) although at first this survey is a big one It was, well, in short, you can move forever. And this game is definitely not worth the money.

It feels like the game is unfinished. Very raw. Countless restrictions on the construction of both outposts and ships have no basis in logic. The lack of any optimization is depressing. All textures, animations, etc. came straight out of Fallout 4. Therefore, it is not clear where such a load on the iron comes from. The main plot is very sluggish and unconvincing. Side quests, with a few exceptions, as in the storyline, to put it mildly, are so-so. There is only one conclusion. The sooner they release tools for modders, the sooner this dead space will come to life. Something like that.

I liked the game, despite the few bugs and friezes that had to be removed using the BES program. Everyone who played it and criticized it, you were in vain. You all did the same with the fallout, mass effect series, and still continued to play like that so you will criticize Starfield and then when everything settles down you will play it the same way...after all, the game is worthy of its player

Bethesda is not good at Sci-fi at all - Fallout 4 showed it, and Starfield proved it. The game is crammed with bad design ideas, and the guns should not work - in general, it’s just painful to play, and most of the mechanics are broken, and considering that the entire game is built on mods, most of the errors from these same mods were pumped into this game.

It’s hard to evaluate this. I can’t say that the game is good or bad... it’s just nothing. The game has poor navigation and descriptions of quests. It’s similar to many things that came before, but it has no individuality. It’s just a candy wrapper. There’s no that feeling like in the old gazebo games, when it just catches you and you get stuck. And for the first time, after spending several evenings playing the game, I thought - what am I doing here? I deleted it and forgot.

A wonderful toy, no worse than Red Dead Redemption or Assassin's Creed, for example. Not without its drawbacks, of course. But what game doesn't have them?! It’s just that, apparently, people were expecting a masterpiece from Besethda, a breakthrough into the future, but what came out was something in the style of combined Fallout, Skyrim, Subnautica and a number of other cool games of the past. The advantages of Starfield are, of course, its scale, a huge number of quests and their interesting lines. It is necessary to constantly master and study different “technologies”; designing starships, building outposts, etc. In the process, you discover that a lot is interconnected. And if you want to successfully complete the game, you need to carefully think through what abilities to develop and… Read full

Great game! I've already spent more than 150 hours in it.

The first version, of course, had a lot of glitches, but I noticed that they have already been fixed.

Very large functionality (construction of outposts, ships and a huge number of side quests). What’s interesting is that the side quests are many times more interesting than the main one. Moreover, side quests appear at moments that you don’t even suspect. For example, an event appeared: a distress signal from a distant planet. It seems that the event is just that, little things, but when I flew there and looked, a whole quest was playing out there (with many different options for execution). As a result, a minor event turned into a 4-hour adventure.

I like the game, and I see that with each new update there are additional small events… Read full

It's still a mess. Why was everything so difficult? I'm not talking about gameplay, but about routine operations like moving resources, opening construction projects...

I played for a month, all at maximum settings. Lack of living world. It’s very empty and the NPCs are just plastic dummies. Absolute lack of social component.

The same type of boring quests.

Graphics from 15 years ago.

The only interesting activity is a ship designer.

A large number of bugs.

In short, this “masterpiece” will only be saved by global fashions. So far it's VERY boring to play.

Well, what can I say about that long-awaited Starfield. The game is not bad, it really pulled me in with the gameplay but not the plot, many hours but there were also a lot of shortcomings that if I try to list I’m tired but if you want to drag on for a week then it’s very suitable I recommend it only because of the large variations in the construction of ships and gameplay although nothing really wow you're unlikely to find it there

They say that this will be the greatest project from Xbox in the entire existence of this office. Maybe it will be so, but the only joke is that before this Xbox had never made any normal games. So this game could be the best of the worst. But if it really is a good game, then we will have 100+ hours of exciting travels around different planets. It’s not particularly clear yet what exactly will happen here, so I can’t say anything more.